|
STROHMEYER: What lessons did Alaskans learn
from the oil spill? Not the ones they deserved to learn. I'm John
Strohmeyer, author of Extreme Conditions: Big Oil and the Transformation
of Alaska. The oil companies of course learned that spills are
expensive in dollars and PR. The oil companies did upgrade their
response teams and they did pledge to replace 18 ships with double-hulled
tankers. But low oil prices and rampant cost cutting placed these
commitments in jeopardy. The state, including its 3 powerful Congressmen,
exert no visible pressure to enforce those promises, Alaska's attitude
seems to be, "God did this to us once, but he wouldn't be so unfair
as to do it to us again."
HUNTER: My name is Cecilia Hunter. I helped
found the Alaska Conservation Society 40 years ago. A lingering
effect of the Exxon oil spill is the loss of innocence. Many Alaskans
believed the oil industry's promises, to use the utmost care to
protect our environment. We've learned to our sorrow that oil promises
are good only if they don't interfere with profits. The problem
continues today. Since the spill we have seen the industry harass
and fire whistle blowers who have pointed out serious maintenance
and safety problems. And instead of working toward real safety,
the oil companies are conducting public relation campaigns.
BAVARIA: I'm Joan Bavaria, President of
Franklin Research and Development Corporation. Ten years ago my
colleagues and I were drafting a set of principles which asked companies
to value the health of the environment as highly as profits. Then
the Exxon Valdez ran aground. That accident gave our idea greater
urgency and its first name, the Valdez Principles, which was later
changed to the CERES Principles. Companies which agreed to that
ethic redesigned a wide range of their operating and management
practices. In the decade since we've learned that this kind of corporate
commitment makes a very positive difference. Over time an environmental
ethic should be deeply embedded in corporate cultures. That would
help ensure that disastrous shortcuts like the one taken by the
Valdez crew are much less likely.
STROUP: I'm Richard Stroup, an economist
at PERC, the Political Economy Research Center in Bozeman, Montana.
The Exxon Valdez spill came soon after the catastrophic fires here
in Yellowstone Park. Nature is recovering nicely in both places.
But back then, scary close-ups of the spilled oil quickly changed
to furious cleanup efforts, people blasting oiled rocks with hot
water and scrubbing oily goo off sea birds. The cleanup efforts
helped us feel better, but the hot water killed microorganisms that
eat oil. And many scrubbed birds just died more slowly than others.
Prince William Sound was already moving naturally toward a new equilibrium,
equally beautiful it appears to me, but with a different balance
of animals and plants. Research funded by the Exxon settlement will
help us better understand nature's resilience, cause fewer such
spills, and be much less destructive in reacting to future alarms.
TRIMBLE: This is Steven Trimble. I'm a writer
and photographer. My home is Salt Lake City. Nearly 30 years ago
I attended a hearing in Denver on a bill to preserve Alaska wilderness.
As I rose to speak, a commissioner challenged me, "Have you been
to Alaska?" No, I have not been there. Like Wallace Stegner, I believe
that we need never see a wilderness to know it's worth saving. That
the idea of such a refuge creates our geography of hope. Twenty
years later, when oil and stupidity and greed soiled my dream of
wildness, I was sick at heart. Feeling helpless but wanting to act,
I sold my few shares of Exxon inherited and half-forgotten, and
felt cleansed. Today I still write letters urging Congress to save
Alaska wild lands. I still believe in acting, even if it may not
make any real difference. I still think of Alaska as my shrine of
wildness, and I still haven't been there.
RYAN: This is John Ryan, with Northwest
Environment Watch in Seattle. I'm author of Over Our Heads: A
Local Look at Global Climate. I remember the Greenpeace ad after
the Exxon Valdez, with Captain Hazelwood's mug shot and the tag
line, "It wasn't his driving that caused the Exxon Valdez oil spill,
it was yours." Well, what was true then is truer today. We're driving
more miles in vehicles that often resemble tanks. We're causing
oil spills every day in our driveways, streams, and oceans. And
we're spilling record amounts of petroleum byproducts, like carbon
dioxide, into the air. This nonstop spill is changing our whole
planet's climate. So I'd like to mark the Valdez anniversary with
new campaigns to drive less. The new tag line: "Step away from the
car and no one gets hurt."
(Music and surf up and under)
|